Accessibility (WCAG) design

SHAPE’s Accessibility (WCAG) design service helps teams ensure inclusive design and standards compliance by translating WCAG requirements into usable patterns, components, and QA-ready acceptance criteria. Learn how WCAG works, what conformance levels mean, and a practical step-by-step approach to design and validate accessible experiences.

Service page • Accessibility-first product design

Accessibility (WCAG) Design Services: Ensuring Inclusive Design and Standards Compliance

Accessibility (WCAG) design ensures digital experiences work for everyone—across assistive technologies, devices, and environments. SHAPE helps teams design and ship inclusive products by aligning UI and content with WCAG principles, reducing legal and reputational risk, and building accessibility into design systems, workflows, and quality assurance.

Talk to SHAPE about Accessibility (WCAG) design

Accessibility (WCAG) design audit showing keyboard focus states, color contrast checks, and screen reader labels to ensure inclusive design and standards compliance

   
 
 
 


Table of contents

     

What are WCAG guidelines (and what they’re for)

WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) is the most widely used standard for making digital content accessible. WCAG provides testable requirements (success criteria) that help teams design and build experiences that are perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust—core pillars of Accessibility (WCAG) design and ensuring inclusive design and standards compliance.

WCAG is a practical design and quality system

Teams often assume accessibility is “a dev checklist.” In practice, the highest-impact work happens earlier: in UX decisions, component behavior, content structure, and interaction states. That’s why SHAPE treats Accessibility (WCAG) design as part of product design—not a last-minute remediation sprint.
     
When accessibility is built into patterns and components, quality improves for all users—not only those using assistive technology.
   

Why Accessibility (WCAG) design matters

Accessibility improves usability, expands reach, and reduces risk. But most importantly, it’s how you ensure your product works in real-world conditions: low vision, motor constraints, cognitive load, temporary injury, noisy environments, bright sunlight, and keyboard-only navigation. This is the heart of ensuring inclusive design and standards compliance.

Outcomes teams see when accessibility is designed in

                                     

Accessibility work becomes even more effective when paired with evidence. If you want to validate high-risk flows with real users (including assistive tech users), combine this with UX research & usability testing.

How WCAG is organized: principles, guidelines, and success criteria

WCAG is intentionally structured so teams can translate high-level intent into testable requirements. Understanding the structure makes Accessibility (WCAG) design easier to plan, design, and verify—supporting ensuring inclusive design and standards compliance across teams.

POUR: the four accessibility principles

                               

Guidelines and success criteria: from intent to tests

Each principle contains guidelines, and each guideline contains success criteria that can be evaluated. In practice, teams design to meet success criteria through:

                               

If you need consistent implementation at scale, we often pair accessibility requirements with UI design systems & component libraries so inclusive patterns become reusable standards.

WCAG conformance levels: A, AA, AAA

WCAG success criteria are grouped into three conformance levels. Most organizations target Level AA because it balances coverage and feasibility while meeting common expectations for ensuring inclusive design and standards compliance.

Level A (baseline access)

Covers essential blockers (e.g., keyboard access, missing text alternatives). Useful as a minimum bar but often not enough for real-world inclusivity.

Level AA (typical product target)

Addresses high-impact issues like color contrast, resizing text, consistent navigation, and error identification—commonly required in procurement and accessibility policies.

Level AAA (context-dependent)

Includes advanced criteria that can be difficult to meet across all content types. Often applied selectively to specific experiences or content.


     
Accessibility is easiest when it’s a system choice (components + patterns + content rules), not a per-page cleanup.
   

What SHAPE delivers: Accessibility (WCAG) design deliverables

SHAPE helps teams build accessibility into the way they design, not just what they ship. Our work focuses on Accessibility (WCAG) design that’s practical, adoptable, and measurable—supporting ensuring inclusive design and standards compliance across product teams.

Accessibility design audit (UX + UI)

                                     

WCAG-aligned component and pattern guidance

We define how core components behave for keyboard and assistive technologies—so accessibility is repeatable. This is especially effective when connected to UI design systems & component libraries.

Design + dev handoff specifications

                         

Validation and usability checks

We validate accessibility decisions with practical checks and, when needed, usability testing to confirm real task success. Related: Wireframing & prototyping for testing risky interactions earlier, and UX research & usability testing for user-validated evidence.

Accessibility (WCAG) design documentation showing semantic headings, form labels, keyboard interactions, and contrast tokens to ensure inclusive design and standards compliance

Use case explanations

1) You’re redesigning a product and want to avoid accessibility debt

Redesigns often introduce new components, new navigation, and new content patterns—making accessibility regressions common. SHAPE integrates Accessibility (WCAG) design into the redesign workflow so you can launch confidently while ensuring inclusive design and standards compliance.

2) Your design system exists, but accessible behavior isn’t standardized

If teams implement components differently, accessibility becomes inconsistent (and expensive to fix). We define accessible states, keyboard interactions, and documentation so the system becomes a reliable source of truth. Related: UI design systems & component libraries.

3) Procurement or customer requirements demand WCAG alignment

Many organizations must provide WCAG documentation or meet accessibility requirements to sell into enterprise, government, education, and healthcare markets. SHAPE helps you translate requirements into design decisions and acceptance criteria—supporting ensuring inclusive design and standards compliance.

4) Your team keeps finding the same issues in QA

Repeated issues (missing focus indicators, mislabeled inputs, inaccessible modals) are system problems. We fix the root: patterns, components, and workflow checklists—so Accessibility (WCAG) design is repeatable.

5) You’re shipping fast and need guardrails that don’t slow delivery

Accessibility doesn’t have to be a bottleneck. We create lightweight checklists, component specs, and review steps that fit your sprint rhythm while still ensuring inclusive design and standards compliance.

Step-by-step tutorial: designing and validating WCAG-aligned experiences

This process reflects how SHAPE operationalizes Accessibility (WCAG) design—so inclusive outcomes are built into design and delivery, not patched in later

                                                       
     
If accessibility work feels overwhelming, start with the design system and top 3 user flows. Standardize those first—then expand.
   

Build accessibility into your product, not around it

If you want to reduce risk, expand reach, and ship a better experience for everyone, SHAPE can help with Accessibility (WCAG) design—focused on ensuring inclusive design and standards compliance across design, engineering, and QA.

Start an Accessibility (WCAG) design engagement

Team

Who are we?

Shape helps companies build an in-house AI workflows that optimise your business. If you’re looking for efficiency we believe we can help.

Customer testimonials

Our clients love the speed and efficiency we provide.

"We are able to spend more time on important, creative things."
Robert C
CEO, Nice M Ltd
"Their knowledge of user experience an optimization were very impressive."
Micaela A
NYC logistics
"They provided a structured environment that enhanced the professionalism of the business interaction."
Khoury H.
CEO, EH Ltd

FAQs

Find answers to your most pressing questions about our services and data ownership.

Who owns the data?

All generated data is yours. We prioritize your ownership and privacy. You can access and manage it anytime.

Integrating with in-house software?

Absolutely! Our solutions are designed to integrate seamlessly with your existing software. Regardless of your current setup, we can find a compatible solution.

What support do you offer?

We provide comprehensive support to ensure a smooth experience. Our team is available for assistance and troubleshooting. We also offer resources to help you maximize our tools.

Can I customize responses

Yes, customization is a key feature of our platform. You can tailor the nature of your agent to fit your brand's voice and target audience. This flexibility enhances engagement and effectiveness.

Pricing?

We adapt pricing to each company and their needs. Since our solutions consist of smart custom integrations, the end cost heavily depends on the integration tactics.

All Services

Find solutions to your most pressing problems.

Agile coaching & delivery management
Architecture consulting
Technical leadership (CTO-as-a-service)
Scalability & performance improvements
Scalability & performance improvements
Monitoring & uptime management
Feature enhancements & A/B testing
Ongoing support & bug fixing
Model performance optimization
Legacy system modernization
App store deployment & optimization
iOS & Android native apps
UX research & usability testing
Information architecture
Market validation & MVP definition
Technical audits & feasibility studies
User research & stakeholder interviews
Product strategy & roadmap
Web apps (React, Vue, Next.js, etc.)
Accessibility (WCAG) design
Security audits & penetration testing
Security audits & penetration testing
Compliance (GDPR, SOC 2, HIPAA)
Performance & load testing
AI regulatory compliance (GDPR, AI Act, HIPAA)
Manual & automated testing
Privacy-preserving AI
Bias detection & mitigation
Explainable AI
Model governance & lifecycle management
AI ethics, risk & governance
AI strategy & roadmap
Use-case identification & prioritization
Data labeling & training workflows
Model performance optimization
AI pipelines & monitoring
Model deployment & versioning
AI content generation
AI content generation
RAG systems (knowledge-based AI)
LLM integration (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)
Custom GPTs & internal AI tools
Personalization engines
AI chatbots & recommendation systems
Process automation & RPA
Machine learning model integration
Data pipelines & analytics dashboards
Custom internal tools & dashboards
Third-party service integrations
ERP / CRM integrations
ERP / CRM integrations
Legacy system modernization
DevOps, CI/CD pipelines
Microservices & serverless systems
Database design & data modeling
Cloud architecture (AWS, GCP, Azure)
API development (REST, GraphQL)
App store deployment & optimization
App architecture & scalability
Cross-platform apps (React Native, Flutter)
Performance optimization & SEO implementation
iOS & Android native apps
E-commerce (Shopify, custom platforms)
CMS development (headless, WordPress, Webflow)
Accessibility (WCAG) design
Web apps (React, Vue, Next.js, etc.)
Marketing websites & landing pages
Design-to-development handoff
Accessibility (WCAG) design
UI design systems & component libraries
Wireframing & prototyping
UX research & usability testing
Information architecture
Market validation & MVP definition
User research & stakeholder interviews