Accessibility (WCAG) design helps teams build products that work for everyone—across assistive technologies, devices, and real-world constraints. SHAPE translates WCAG into practical UX, UI, and content decisions so you can ship confidently while ensuring inclusive design and standards compliance.

Talk to SHAPE about Accessibility (WCAG) design

Accessibility is a product quality system: design, build, and validate for real users and assistive technologies.

WCAG overview: what it is (and why it matters)

WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) is the most widely adopted accessibility standard for digital experiences. It defines testable success criteria that product teams can design and build against—core to Accessibility (WCAG) design and ensuring inclusive design and standards compliance.

• WCAG is practical: it’s written to be tested (manual + automated checks).
• WCAG is cross-functional: design, engineering, content, and QA all own parts of compliance.
• WCAG is ongoing: as your product changes, accessibility must remain true.

Design principle: If accessibility is only checked at the end, it becomes expensive and inconsistent. Inclusive outcomes happen when accessibility is designed into patterns and components.

Related services (internal links)

Accessibility improves fastest when it becomes repeatable across your delivery system. Teams commonly pair Accessibility (WCAG) design with:

• UI design systems & component libraries to standardize accessible components and states.
• Design-to-development handoff to make accessibility requirements build-ready and testable.
• UX research & usability testing to validate real task success (not just checklist compliance).
• Performance optimization & SEO implementation to align semantic structure and usability signals with discoverability.

The POUR principles: the backbone of accessible experiences

WCAG is organized around four principles, often summarized as POUR. SHAPE uses POUR as a shared language across UX, UI, and engineering when ensuring inclusive design and standards compliance.

Perceivable

Users must be able to perceive content and UI elements—regardless of vision, hearing, or environment. In Accessibility (WCAG) design, this commonly includes:

• Text alternatives for images and meaningful icons
• Color contrast that supports readability
• Flexible text sizing and layout that remains usable

Operable

Users must be able to operate the interface with different inputs. This is where many products fail basic ensuring inclusive design and standards compliance if not designed early.

• Keyboard accessibility for navigation and actions
• Focus order that matches the visual flow
• Enough time to complete tasks without traps or unexpected timeouts

Understandable

Users must be able to understand both content and interaction behavior. Accessibility (WCAG) design supports clarity through:

• Consistent navigation and predictable interaction patterns
• Clear labels, error messages, and instructions
• Form validation that explains what happened and how to fix it

Robust

Content must be robust enough to work across browsers, devices, and assistive technologies—now and as technology evolves.

• Semantic structure (headings, landmarks, form associations)
• Accessible names for interactive components
• Compatible behavior with screen readers and keyboard navigation

POUR provides a shared checklist for inclusive interaction: Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust.

WCAG conformance levels: A, AA, AAA

WCAG success criteria are grouped into three conformance levels. Most organizations target Level AA because it balances impact and feasibility while still ensuring inclusive design and standards compliance.

• Level A: baseline requirements that remove fundamental blockers.
• Level AA: the most common product target, often used in procurement and policy requirements.
• Level AAA: advanced criteria, typically applied selectively for specific experiences.

Practical framing: Level AA is where accessibility becomes broadly usable, not merely “technically accessible.”

How SHAPE delivers Accessibility (WCAG) design

SHAPE treats Accessibility (WCAG) design as a repeatable delivery system, not a one-off remediation sprint. Our work focuses on ensuring inclusive design and standards compliance through patterns, documentation, and validation.

1) Accessibility design audit (UX + UI)

• Identify high-risk user journeys and components (forms, modals, navigation, tables)
• Map issues to WCAG success criteria (so fixes are trackable)
• Prioritize remediation by user impact and engineering effort

2) Component and pattern guidance (build accessibility into the system)

We define how components should behave across keyboard, screen reader, and touch usage. This is often most effective when implemented via UI design systems & component libraries.

3) Build-ready specs and acceptance criteria

We convert accessibility requirements into implementation guidance that engineers and QA can verify. For teams scaling delivery, this pairs naturally with Design-to-development handoff.

4) Validation (assistive tech + real workflows)

We validate key workflows with practical checks and usability signals, and when needed, run sessions via UX research & usability testing to ensure your product is both compliant and genuinely usable.

Request an accessibility review

Use case explanations

1) You’re redesigning a product and want to avoid accessibility debt

Redesigns introduce new components and navigation patterns—where accessibility issues often reappear. SHAPE embeds Accessibility (WCAG) design into the redesign workflow to keep ensuring inclusive design and standards compliance consistent from day one.

2) Your design system exists, but accessible behavior isn’t standardized

If teams implement the “same” component differently, accessibility becomes inconsistent and expensive to fix. We standardize focus behavior, accessible names, and keyboard interactions—often through UI design systems & component libraries.

3) Enterprise buyers require WCAG alignment evidence

Procurement frequently asks for clear accessibility practices and outcomes. We translate WCAG into documented patterns, acceptance criteria, and verification steps to support ensuring inclusive design and standards compliance without slowing product delivery.

4) QA keeps finding recurring accessibility issues

Repeated issues (missing focus indicators, unlabeled inputs, inaccessible dialogs) indicate missing standards. We fix root causes through reusable patterns and build-ready specs—so Accessibility (WCAG) design becomes a team habit.

5) You need accessibility guardrails that don’t create friction

We implement lightweight, high-impact guardrails: component defaults, content rules, and review checkpoints—so you maintain momentum while ensuring inclusive design and standards compliance.

Step-by-step tutorial: design and validate WCAG-aligned experiences

This practical playbook shows how to operationalize Accessibility (WCAG) design so inclusive outcomes are designed, built, and verified.

1. Step 1: Choose the target level and scope (usually AA) Define what’s in scope (product areas, templates, critical flows) and set the target conformance level. This turns accessibility into a measurable plan.
2. Step 2: Map critical user journeys and risk hotspots Identify high-impact workflows (signup, checkout, onboarding, settings) and high-risk UI patterns (modals, menus, tables, complex forms).
3. Step 3: Audit against POUR (Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust) Run a structured review to find issues tied to WCAG success criteria—especially focus, contrast, labeling, and semantic structure.
4. Step 4: Turn issues into component-level fixes Prioritize system fixes over one-off patches. Standardize buttons, inputs, dialogs, and navigation so accessibility is repeatable.
5. Step 5: Add clear design + dev specs Document keyboard interaction rules, focus order, aria labeling expectations, and error messaging requirements so implementation is consistent.
6. Step 6: Validate with keyboard + screen reader checks Verify real task completion using keyboard-only navigation and at least one screen reader workflow on target platforms.
7. Step 7: Add QA acceptance criteria and regression coverage Create a repeatable checklist for releases: focus visible, labels present, contrast meets target, headings and landmarks are correct.
8. Step 8: Operationalize (ownership + cadence) Assign owners for the design system, documentation, and accessibility checks. Add a cadence to review new components and high-risk changes.

Practical tip: Accessibility improves fastest when you standardize component behavior first—then apply those components across templates and flows.

Start an Accessibility (WCAG) design engagement