Service page • Enterprise & Systems Integration • Process automation & RPA

Process Automation & RPA: Automating Workflows Using Software Bots

Process automation & RPA helps organizations reduce manual work, improve accuracy, and speed up operations by automating workflows using software bots. SHAPE designs and implements automation that fits real operations—integrating systems, handling exceptions, and creating visibility—so automation keeps working after launch (not just in a demo).

Talk to SHAPE about process automation & RPA

Great process automation & RPA is built for reality: integrations, exception paths, and monitoring—not only “happy path” clicks.

Table of contents

• What SHAPE’s process automation & RPA service includes
• What is process automation & RPA?
• Benefits of automating workflows using software bots
• Automation types and patterns
• Governance, security, and reliability
• Use case explanations
• Step-by-step tutorial: build a production-ready automation

What SHAPE’s process automation & RPA service includes

SHAPE delivers process automation & RPA as a production engineering engagement focused on one outcome: automating workflows using software bots in a way that is stable, auditable, and measurable. We map processes end-to-end, choose the right automation approach (not always pure RPA), then implement orchestration, monitoring, and exception handling so operations can trust the system daily.

Typical deliverables

• Automation discovery: process inventory, pain points, owners, volumes, and exception patterns.
• Automation feasibility + ROI model: time saved, cycle-time reduction, error reduction, and operational risk.
• Target workflow design: “to-be” process, decision rules, and handoffs (human + bot).
• Bot + integration implementation: UI automation where needed, API-first automation where possible.
• Orchestration: schedules, triggers, queues, retries, and idempotency for safe re-runs.
• Observability: run dashboards, failure alerts, and runbooks for support teams.
• Controls + auditability: approvals, logs, and traceability for sensitive actions.
• Handoff + enablement: documentation, operator training, and a backlog for iterative improvement.

Rule: If automation moves money, customer data, or compliance-sensitive records, process automation & RPA must include audit logs, monitoring, and safe rollback—not just a bot script.

Related services (internal links)

Process automation & RPA works best when integrations, data, and operational tooling are aligned. Teams commonly pair automating workflows using software bots with:

• Third-party service integrations to connect external tools and platforms reliably.
• API development (REST, GraphQL) to replace fragile UI automation with stable contracts.
• Custom internal tools & dashboards to operationalize approvals, queues, and exception handling.
• Data pipelines & analytics dashboards to measure throughput, SLAs, and automation impact.
• DevOps, CI/CD pipelines to deploy automation safely with environments, secrets, and tests.

What is process automation & RPA?

Process automation & RPA is the practice of designing systems that reduce manual work by automating repeatable business tasks end-to-end. RPA (Robotic Process Automation) is one approach within that category—using software bots to mimic human actions in user interfaces (clicking, copying, downloading, entering data).

In real operations, automating workflows using software bots often includes more than UI clicks: APIs, events, scheduled jobs, document processing, approvals, and reconciliation. SHAPE chooses the smallest, most reliable automation approach that meets the business goal.

What gets automated (practically)

• Data movement: copy values across systems, sync records, update statuses.
• Validation: check rules, required fields, and business constraints.
• Routing: assign work to teams/queues based on rules or thresholds.
• Notifications: trigger messages, tickets, or alerts when conditions are met.
• Reconciliation: compare records across tools and flag mismatches.

If a workflow is repeated daily and mistakes are costly, it’s a strong candidate for process automation & RPA.

Benefits of automating workflows using software bots

Organizations invest in process automation & RPA to eliminate repetitive tasks, increase throughput, and reduce operational errors. The goal of automating workflows using software bots is not “less people”—it’s better operations: faster cycle times, fewer handoffs, and more consistent outcomes.

Business outcomes you can measure

• Cycle-time reduction: faster approvals, onboarding, order processing, or reconciliations.
• Error reduction: fewer manual entry mistakes and policy violations.
• Capacity recovery: teams spend time on exceptions and judgment, not copy/paste.
• Higher consistency: standard rules applied every time.
• Better visibility: dashboards and logs for what happened, when, and why.

When RPA is a great fit (and when it isn’t)

• Good fit: stable UIs, repetitive steps, clear rules, and limited system integration options.
• Not ideal: frequently changing UIs, complex logic without a stable contract, or processes that should be redesigned first.

Practical takeaway: SHAPE uses RPA when it’s the right tool—but we often reduce bot fragility by shifting to APIs and integrations (see API development (REST, GraphQL) and Third-party service integrations).

Automation types and patterns

Effective process automation & RPA uses the right pattern for the job. When automating workflows using software bots, the best result often comes from a hybrid: APIs for reliability, RPA for UI-only systems, and orchestration to manage steps and exceptions.

Rule-based workflow automation (orchestration)

Best for: multi-step business processes with clear decision points (approvals, routing, checks). Orchestration turns “tribal knowledge” into repeatable flows and creates auditability.

RPA (UI automation)

Best for: legacy tools or third-party platforms where APIs are limited. RPA excels at automating workflows using software bots when the UI is stable and steps are consistent.

API-first automation

Best for: reliability and scale. API automation is more resilient than UI automation because contracts change less often than screens. It also supports better error handling and observability.

Event-driven automation

Best for: reacting to events (new order created, payment received, ticket escalated) without polling. This pattern often pairs with Microservices & serverless systems for scalable triggers and processing.

Human-in-the-loop automation

Best for: high-risk decisions. The bot prepares work (collects data, validates, drafts updates), then a human approves. This is often the safest way to start process automation & RPA for regulated or high-impact workflows.

Decision rule: Use RPA for UI-only gaps, APIs for reliability, and orchestration for end-to-end control—so automating workflows using software bots stays stable as systems evolve.

Governance, security, and reliability

Automation fails when trust fails. SHAPE designs process automation & RPA so automating workflows using software bots is secure, observable, and correct—even when systems are slow, data is messy, or upstream tools change.

Reliability controls we implement

• Idempotency: safe re-runs without duplicates (critical for money-impacting actions).
• Retries with backoff: handle transient failures without creating retry storms.
• Timeouts: prevent stuck runs from blocking queues.
• Dead-letter / exception queues: isolate failures for triage and repair.
• Reconciliation: periodic checks to prove systems remain aligned.

Security basics for software bots

• Least privilege: bot identities have only the permissions they need.
• Secrets management: credentials stored securely, rotated, never hard-coded.
• Audit logs: who/what changed data, when, and through which bot/version.
• Environment separation: dev/stage/prod configurations and access boundaries.

Operational visibility (so teams can trust it)

• Run dashboards: throughput, success rate, backlog, and cycle times
• Alerts: failure spikes, SLA breaches, unusual volume, or repeated exceptions
• Runbooks: how to diagnose, replay, and safely recover

For structured measurement and reporting, teams often pair automation with Data pipelines & analytics dashboards.

Use case explanations

1) Invoice processing and accounts payable (AP)

AP workflows often include email attachments, PDFs, approvals, and ERP updates. SHAPE implements process automation & RPA to extract key fields, validate rules, route approvals, and update systems—automating workflows using software bots while keeping auditability intact.

2) Employee onboarding and access provisioning

Onboarding requires repeatable steps across HR tools, IT systems, and internal trackers. Automation reduces delays by triggering tasks, creating accounts, and tracking completion—while still supporting approvals when needed.

3) Customer support triage and routing

Support teams lose time on manual categorization and status updates. We automate routing, tagging, and SLA checks, and surface exceptions in a queue (often via Custom internal tools & dashboards).

4) Data reconciliation across systems

When CRM, ERP, billing, and spreadsheets disagree, operations slows down. Process automation & RPA can compare records, flag mismatches, and trigger remediation workflows—automating workflows using software bots so finance and ops aren’t doing weekly “data hunts.”

5) Legacy system automation when APIs aren’t available

Some legacy tools can’t be integrated cleanly. In those cases, RPA provides a pragmatic bridge. SHAPE reduces fragility by isolating UI interactions, adding monitoring, and pairing with longer-term modernization (see Legacy system modernization).

Step-by-step tutorial: build a production-ready process automation & RPA workflow

This playbook mirrors how SHAPE ships process automation & RPA that lasts—automating workflows using software bots with reliability, security, and measurable impact.

1. Step 1: Pick one workflow and define “done” in metrics Choose a single, high-volume process. Define baseline metrics (cycle time, error rate, manual touches) and the target improvement. Keep scope tight so the first automation is a fast win.
2. Step 2: Map the current process (including exceptions) Document the real steps people take today: inputs, systems touched, edge cases, and approvals. Automation breaks when exception paths are ignored.
3. Step 3: Decide the automation approach (API-first, RPA, or hybrid) Prefer APIs where possible for durability. Use RPA when the UI is the only feasible surface. Combine both when needed to automate workflows using software bots end-to-end.
4. Step 4: Define data contracts and validation rules Specify required fields, formats, and “reject/route” rules. Strong validation prevents silent corruption and reduces downstream cleanup.
5. Step 5: Build orchestration (triggers, queues, retries) Decide what triggers runs (event, schedule, manual start). Implement queues, timeouts, retries, and idempotency so reruns are safe.
6. Step 6: Implement the bot and exception handling Automate happy path steps and explicitly design what happens on failure: reroute to a queue, request approval, or pause for human review.
7. Step 7: Add observability and audit logs Instrument run metrics, error categories, and per-record traceability. If a run changes a record, you should be able to explain it quickly.
8. Step 8: Test with real data and run in parallel Use a shadow/parallel run to validate outcomes without impact. Compare results, tune thresholds, and confirm exception routing works.
9. Step 9: Roll out gradually and iterate Start with limited volume, measure results, then expand. Keep a backlog of improvements (new exceptions, better validation, faster integrations) so process automation & RPA compounds value over time.

Practical tip: The most common failure in automating workflows using software bots is treating automation as a “script.” Treat it like a product system: version it, monitor it, and operate it.