UX Research & Usability Testing Services

Evaluating user behavior through research and testing is how SHAPE helps teams turn assumptions into evidence, reduce UX risk, and ship experiences that feel obvious to real users. From early concept validation to in-product usability testing, we combine qualitative insight with clear recommendations—so you can improve task success, conversion, adoption, and satisfaction.

Talk to SHAPE about UX research & usability testing

What is usability testing (and why it’s the fastest way to improve UX)?

Usability testing is a practical method for observing people attempt real tasks using your product, prototype, or website—then identifying what helps, what confuses, and what blocks success. It’s a core part of UX research & usability testing because it reveals friction you can’t reliably find in meetings, analytics, or internal reviews.

At SHAPE, usability testing is always anchored in one goal: evaluating user behavior through research and testing so teams can make better product and design decisions with less rework.

What usability testing measures (beyond “do they like it?”)

Usability testing vs. UX research: how they work together

UX research is the broader discipline of understanding needs, context, motivations, and constraints. Usability testing focuses on interaction—how people perform tasks with a specific experience. The best outcomes come from combining both: understanding why and observing what happens—i.e., evaluating user behavior through research and testing across the full decision cycle.

When to run UX research & usability testing

Usability testing isn’t a “nice-to-have” phase at the end. It’s most cost-effective when used throughout the product lifecycle—especially when you’re making decisions that are expensive to undo.

High-ROI moments to test

Internal service links: UX research & usability testing often pairs with discovery alignment like User research & stakeholder interviews, structure work like Information architecture, and planning support like Product strategy & roadmap.

Types of usability testing SHAPE runs (and what each is best for)

Different questions require different test setups. SHAPE designs the lightest-weight method that still produces credible answers—always centered on evaluating user behavior through research and testing.

Moderated usability testing (live sessions)

Best when you need to understand why users struggle and want to probe mental models in real time. Works well for complex B2B workflows, onboarding, and high-stakes transactions.

Unmoderated usability testing (remote, self-guided)

Best when you need faster turnaround, a larger sample, or quick comparison across variants. Great for navigation clarity, content findability, and first-click validation.

Prototype testing (low risk, high learning)

Test clickable prototypes before code. This is often the highest-leverage form of UX research & usability testing because it prevents expensive rework later.

Benchmark testing (baseline + progress)

Best for measuring improvement over time with consistent tasks and metrics (success rate, time on task, error rate). Useful for redesigns, modernization, and ongoing optimization.

Accessibility-informed usability checks

Best for ensuring interactions remain usable for diverse users and assistive technology patterns. This strengthens outcomes when evaluating user behavior through research and testing across real-world conditions.

What you get from SHAPE’s UX research & usability testing

Teams don’t need a 60-page report. They need clear findings, prioritized recommendations, and decision support. Our deliverables make evaluating user behavior through research and testing actionable.

Core deliverables

What we optimize for

Use case explanations: where usability testing pays off fastest

1) New onboarding flow with activation drop-off

When users abandon onboarding, the cause is often unclear instructions, missing context, or confusing decision points. Usability testing identifies where and why users stall, enabling targeted fixes by evaluating user behavior through research and testing rather than guessing.

2) Checkout, pricing, or upgrade path that underperforms

Conversion friction can hide in tiny details: unclear pricing language, distracting page hierarchy, or trust gaps. A focused usability test reveals the moments users hesitate—then translates them into improvements you can ship.

3) Complex B2B workflows (admin, reporting, approvals)

Enterprise users often work under time pressure and policy constraints. SHAPE designs task-based sessions to validate navigation, terminology, and system feedback—evaluating user behavior through research and testing in realistic scenarios.

4) Navigation and findability issues in content-heavy experiences

If users can’t find what already exists, you don’t have a content problem—you have a findability problem. Usability testing, paired with IA methods, validates labels, grouping, and pathways. Related: Information architecture.

5) Redesigns that stakeholders can’t agree on

Opinions multiply when evidence is missing. Structured UX research & usability testing creates a shared source of truth, helping teams decide faster with less debate.

Step-by-step tutorial: how to run usability testing that produces decisions

This process reflects how SHAPE approaches UX research & usability testing—with a practical focus on evaluating user behavior through research and testing to produce improvements you can implement.

   
If users can’t confidently predict what will happen after a click, clarity—not capability—is the problem.
 

Ready to evaluate user behavior through research and testing?

If you’re redesigning a critical flow, shipping a new feature, or trying to improve adoption and conversion, SHAPE can help with UX research & usability testing. We focus on evaluating user behavior through research and testing so your team can make faster decisions and ship more usable experiences.

Start a UX research & usability testing engagement

Technical SEO, accessibility, and performance (built into the page)